• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Expert Witnessing
  • Technical Consulting
  • Experience
  • Blog
  • Contact

River Sonic Solutions

Expert Witnessing and Technical Consulting in imaging, signal processing and electronics

Voice biometrics expert witness: signal processing enables new forms of identity verification

By Dr. Chris Daft

voice biometrics expert witness

Defining voice biometrics

Biometrics – automated recognition of a person based on a physiological or behavioral characteristic – continues to increase in importance. Smart cards, magnetic stripe cards, photo ID cards, and physical keys can be lost, stolen, duplicated, or left at home. Passwords can be forgotten, shared, or observed.

But if well implemented, biometric identification can provide substantial improvement in diverse areas like access control, fraud detection and user experience.

I wrote before on new developments in behavioral biometrics. Voice biometrics is another area where activity is booming. Start-ups are being funded (e.g., Omilia); product introductions abound at the Consumer Electronics Show (e.g., Sensory) while high-profile technology failures have also occurred.  And where business is booming, litigation soon follows. Voice biometrics expert witnesses will be needed.

Federal agencies such as NIST and NSA have promulgated standards such as the Common Biometric Exchange File Format (CBEFF) and the Biometric Application Programming Interface. This patent area has been very active with fundamental IP such as the patent ”Device for Speaker’s Verification” filed as long ago as 1983 – so the investigation of prior art in a voice biometrics patent dispute will require research.

To work well, voice biometric data need the characteristics that define valuable biometric data generally—they must be:

  • Universal: applicable to everyone
  • Unique
  • Permanent, or varying little with time
  • Easily collectible
  • Nonintrusive in use
  • Hard to circumvent.

How does voice biometrics work? A microphone hardware digitizes a profile of speech to produce a stored voice signal. Each spoken word is broken up into segments from which dominant frequencies called formants are extracted. The formants identify the speaker’s unique voice print. These acoustic patterns reflect both anatomy (e.g., size and shape of the throat and mouth) and learned behavioral patterns (e.g., voice pitch and speaking style).

The key technology in voice biometrics is signal processing. The intensive use of signal processing like AI and machine learning shows up in these products in several forms, implemented in both software and hardware. Data acquisition in voice biometrics often takes advantage of microphone arrays to improve data quality through beam steering. That is a signal processing technique borrowed from radar and medical imaging which reduces background noise and increases biometric accuracy.

The possible uses of voice biometrics are endless.  For example, the huge financial company Vanguard is using voice biometrics to verify the identity of investors who call in for assistance.  This is both easier and quicker for the user and provides important security benefits.

Litigation in voice biometrics

Due to the pace of technological advancement and the potential financial rewards, a good deal of voice biometric litigation occurs in the patent and trade secret fields.  These cases will almost certainly require expert witnesses in voice biometrics.

Beyond intellectual property concerns, pioneering legislation such as the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) has caused cases to multiply. This is particularly true after the Illinois Supreme Court in January 2019 held that an individual need not demonstrate actual harm to establish that he or she is “aggrieved” under BIPA (Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 2019 IL 123186, Jan. 25, 2019.)

Conclusion

Voice biometrics expert witnesses will be in increasing demand as voice biometrics technology is developed and deployed at enormous scale.

Filed Under: Expert Witness

Previous Post: « Remote source code review expert witness: options for attorneys

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Dr. Chris Daft

Dr Chris Daft

Dr. Chris Daft is an award winning, Oxford Educated scientist who provides technical consulting and expert witnessing services.
Learn more...

Connect

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Quick Links

  • Technical Consulting
  • Expert Witnessing
  • SEAK Expert Witness Listing
  • Experience
  • Consultants Network of Silicon Valley

Footer

Company Information

2443 Fillmore St. #380-4039
San Francisco, CA 94115
USA

Technical Consulting

(925) 452-6803

info@riversonicsolutions.com

Expert Witnessing

(415) 800-3734

expert@riversonicsolutions.com

Connect on LinkedIn

  • LinkedIn

Follow on Twitter

RiverSonic SolutionsFollow

RiverSonic Solutions
RiverSonicSolnsRiverSonic Solutions@RiverSonicSolns·
February 24, 2021

Many congratulations to the authors of an imminent and much-needed book on #MEMS product development! I'm glad to have learned so much from Alissa M. Fitzgerald, Ph.D.
https://lnkd.in/gfRn6Q7 https://lnkd.in/gRQhXyq

Reply on Twitter 1364729646655238145Retweet on Twitter 1364729646655238145Like on Twitter 1364729646655238145Twitter 1364729646655238145
RiverSonicSolnsRiverSonic Solutions@RiverSonicSolns·
February 4, 2021

Virtual juries, remote depositions and cybersecurity - a judge's view of #litigation in the new normal world https://lnkd.in/g8jDjJj

Reply on Twitter 1357476288198365184Retweet on Twitter 13574762881983651841Like on Twitter 13574762881983651841Twitter 1357476288198365184
RiverSonicSolnsRiverSonic Solutions@RiverSonicSolns·
January 30, 2021

How long does it take to #patent your idea? Two years on average, but there are specialized techniques which sometimes accelerate the process a lot https://lnkd.in/gKK5A-t

Reply on Twitter 1355586806952075269Retweet on Twitter 1355586806952075269Like on Twitter 1355586806952075269Twitter 1355586806952075269
RiverSonicSolnsRiverSonic Solutions@RiverSonicSolns·
January 13, 2021

In 1947, startling lab results reached Israel Weinstein, NYC's health commissioner: someone who arrived from Mexico City tested positive for smallpox https://lnkd.in/gZTbaHb

Reply on Twitter 1349476260091551744Retweet on Twitter 1349476260091551744Like on Twitter 1349476260091551744Twitter 1349476260091551744
RiverSonicSolnsRiverSonic Solutions@RiverSonicSolns·
December 25, 2020

"Words are to a lawyer what mathematics is to a physicist." For holiday #law amusement, check out the long shadow of the 15th century, when each case was trilingual: https://lnkd.in/gb9xvv9

Reply on Twitter 1342606210604797953Retweet on Twitter 1342606210604797953Like on Twitter 13426062106047979531Twitter 1342606210604797953
Load More...

Copyright © 2021 River Sonic Solutions, San Francisco, California · Website design by Christine Cobb Marketing · Contact Us