In a recent inter partes review (IPR) of an alternating current light emitting diode patent, a pivotal reference was filed with the USPTO before the patent's critical date, yet it was published afterward. Despite this, the PTAB ruled the challenged claims unpatentable based in part on that reference. This case has garnered amicus briefs from PIPLI, HTIA, CCIA, Intel and VLSI … [Read more...] about Can Patent Applications Filed Before but Published After a Patent’s Critical Date Be Used in IPR Proceedings?
Transducer Technology and Related Litigation
Introduction In the ever-evolving landscape of medical device technology, transducers play a pivotal role in bridging the gap between electronic signals and the physical world. In my work as an expert witness specializing in medical devices, signal processing, semiconductors, and MEMS, I've observed the increasing importance of transducers in both technological advancements … [Read more...] about Transducer Technology and Related Litigation
New ruling on expert qualification in patent cases
In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit provided guidance on the qualification of expert witnesses in #patent cases. The case in question centered on a challenge to the plaintiff's technical expert. Defense counsel argued that the expert lacked specific experience in diagnostic imaging at the time of the alleged invention. They attempted to differentiate this from the … [Read more...] about New ruling on expert qualification in patent cases
Expert Witnessing on Voice Biometrics in Patent Litigation
Introduction Biometrics – the automated recognition of a person based on a physiological or behavioral characteristic – serves an important role. Photo ID cards, smart cards, magnetic stripe cards, and physical keys can be lost, stolen, duplicated, or left at home. Passwords can be shared, forgotten, or observed. If well implemented, biometric identification can provide a … [Read more...] about Expert Witnessing on Voice Biometrics in Patent Litigation
Changes to admissibility criteria for expert testimony
The changes to Federal Rules of Evidence 702, now six months old, have brought significant impacts on expert testimony admissibility. In this article, Daniel Callaway and Tim Horgan-Kobelski of FBM analyze the effects so far. As highlighted by the authors, the consequences of a successful Daubert motion can be pivotal in shaping the course of a trial. In patent cases, the … [Read more...] about Changes to admissibility criteria for expert testimony